Re: [PATCH] MIPS:i8259.c remove resume and shutdown to syscore_ops

[Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com>]

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 24, 2011, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:19:18PM +0800, Pengfei Zhang wrote:
>> >
>> > > Remove the resume and shutdown of i8259A from the sysdev_class
>> > > to the syscore_ops since these members had removed from the
>> > > structure sysdev_class.
>> >
>> > I don't see why one would want to want to first call
>> > register_syscore_ops
>> > then sysdev_class_register and sysdev_register?
>> >
>> Hi Ralf:
>> If these not moved to syscore_ops, building will get error.
>>
>> Hi Thomas:
>> Does you mean that we can just remove the sysfs entry now ?
>
> I had the appended patch in my tree before the merge window started,
> but it conflicted with analogous changes in the MIPS tree, so I had
> dropped it.  Was it a mistake?
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> Acked-and-tested-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
> ---
>  arch/mips/alchemy/common/dbdma.c |   92 
> +++++++++++----------------------------
>  arch/mips/alchemy/common/irq.c   |   62 +++++++++-----------------

I took care of these two, they were the reason for the conflict in -next.

Manuel