| To: | <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | After writing successfully a NAND block is this reliable ar reading as a NOR sector? |
| From: | "Ardelean, Andrei" <Andrei.Ardelean@idt.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:31:01 -0700 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| Thread-index: | Acv1SZCM2iZJg7PmSYSrxfmO5vrwtg== |
| Thread-topic: | After writing successfully a NAND block is this reliable ar reading as a NOR sector? |
Hi, Am interested in using MT29F2G08AABWP NAND Flash memory for a new embedded design and I couldn't find a clear specification regarding how reliable is the NAND flash vs. NOR for reading operation. If I program successfully a NAND block, read back and verify successfully the information and never erase or program that particular block again, can I assume that block will remain a good block and the information written there is safe for READING, roughly as safe as a NOR sector? Is it any reason to keep in NAND copies of Kernel, bootloader or RFS? Is it a standard practice in the industry to keep copies in NAND even though we do not erase/program those during the normal operation? Thank you, Andrei |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH V5 05/10] MIPS: lantiq: add watchdog support, Sergei Shtylyov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Linux on MIPS emulator?, James Bowery |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH V5 05/10] MIPS: lantiq: add watchdog support, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Next by Thread: | Linux on MIPS emulator?, James Bowery |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |