|To:||Lars-Peter Clausen <email@example.com>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH 1/2]: Add support for Dallas/Maxim DS1685/1687 RTC|
|Date:||Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:02:00 -0500|
|Cc:||Linux MIPS List <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com|
|References:||<4D5A65E3.firstname.lastname@example.org> <4D5C5C66.email@example.com> <4D5CF0EE.firstname.lastname@example.org> <4D5D09FF.email@example.com>|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:18.104.22.168) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7|
On 02/17/2011 06:43, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
That is what I meant. Pass the return value of rtc_valid_tm on, instead of setting the time to 0 and pretend everything went fine. You can still keep the dev_err though, no problem with that.
Okay, I got confused by this and thought you were referring to the quoted test box below in your first response. My bad. You're referring to the tail end of ds1685_rtc_read_time.
To clarify, this construct exists in four existing RTC drivers. If this is wrong, I suggest fixing these four drivers, lest someone else come along and try to copy the idea, thinking it's the RightThing();
drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1553.c:131 drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1742.c:119 drivers/rtc/rtc-rs5c348.c:136 drivers/rtc/rtc-stk17ta8.c:133 I am going to assume the proper approach is: return rtc_Valid_tm(tm); Cheers!, -- Joshua Kinard Gentoo/MIPS firstname.lastname@example.org"The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between."
--Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: some questions about kernel source, loody|
|Next by Date:||Re: some questions about kernel source, Anoop P A|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [PATCH 1/2]: Add support for Dallas/Maxim DS1685/1687 RTC, Kumba|
|Next by Thread:||[PATCH 2/2]: Add support for Dallas/Maxim DS1685/1687 RTC, Kumba|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|