| To: | David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Filling in struct mips64_watch_regs from a 32 bit process |
| From: | Earl Chew <echew@ixiacom.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:12:28 -0800 |
| Cc: | "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <4D475BCB.9050403@caviumnetworks.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <4D4756B5.4010100@ixiacom.com> <4D475BCB.9050403@caviumnetworks.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
>> I notice that a 32 bit process running on a 64 bit kernel is expected to >> know that it should fill in mips64_watch_regs --- even though it is running >> against a 32 bit ABI. >> >> Is this an oversight, or am I missing something ? > > It is intentional. Oh I see ... I have to call PTRACE_SET_WATCH_REGS first in order to figure out whether the kernel is expecting me to use pt_watch_style_mips32 or pt_watch_style_mips64. Thanks. Earl |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Filling in struct mips64_watch_regs from a 32 bit process, David Daney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Filling in struct mips64_watch_regs from a 32 bit process, David Daney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Filling in struct mips64_watch_regs from a 32 bit process, David Daney |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Filling in struct mips64_watch_regs from a 32 bit process, David Daney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |