| To: | Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | about udelay in mips |
| From: | loody <miloody@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:02:28 +0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iu+mfZM4FaTgl1u0lI/UyCBoqiwcQfHq7a7wF2nOTn8=; b=KaI5Efy2kMJLx9T8mFFjybE7pQmf5BvsNWNWQzEF32LviJXh6fCNcxI6uUwg1XoD8u 8TeZMyd6jqkYmaIugkpQyig8RCl+BVYAygBi4d2dqtFfS0ng5xweQWGB+cNOeyJRLJLm yUDtRaDYp6rLPMbURa1wa9XiCIo2dzxutrByg= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=lZM9lvoHOQwPMF8u8C/qAa6aBNjskywSzV3LZegUCDqr18GCWI1iuCmaTZ/fGNoY9f ej3Gx/lNzn3q0rGaOJVQJWNSTD8zL5ALj6WbabdWoTmvQ++BosGX6smxkKPd9J5g0xlI VOB6vYolU4sWdVTFaUjafS/1TUZorismvCu+g= |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
hi all: If i trace source in the correct place, I found udelay(100) is implemented as a loop which decrease 1 per iteration until the count, 100, as 0. What makes me confused is since the speed of cpus are different and that will make udelay not precise on different platform, right? -- Regards, miloody |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SMTC support status in latest git head., Kevin D. Kissell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 01/10] MIPS: lantiq: add initial support for Lantiq SoCs, Daniel Schwierzeck |
| Previous by Thread: | MIPS Malta and PCNet32 Driver, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: about udelay in mips, wu zhangjin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |