[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 00/10] MIPS: add support for Lantiq SoCs

To: John Crispin <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] MIPS: add support for Lantiq SoCs
From: Daniel Schwierzeck <>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:40:56 +0100
Cc: Ralf Baechle <>, Ralph Hempel <>,
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ASL09LrJzrAoAhOfLZ1yRFx4owX6TBU4GhVBOoR6txs=; b=pnW+hDuCEShAj80Khvje5JN113HyGdRjLcnTIa66Y+5EEKObceQaqoM8OFrSLIZRSq 5ia11NchsIVMxSmigFVLWX4qe/3PFsRkrizeA6qBp/dGspnt+3J4oT/KnAncqYOceZo2 sXTOdPXBJfj4R3LtFxO6X4J+jZXm5R8YEYwsE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=atKHwlcRdea6DgG0Udw4SzaMi1LWILgcWsIxfyEuAS766R8/LHYaEm0MG96RAV8C+r O6hVyiZYkZdlYyXL8J2v/rj4qMckFgZXDG5MPljxWFQAqFHkuZnINEVMJQtKQWTGkMXz uz4B/PDyeOgU3MyytgHknhcfaGYdmiPnKwDsQ=
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <>
Hi John,

2011/1/11 John Crispin <>:
> On 11/01/11 03:44, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
>> Hi John,
>> after the 2.6.36 release i've started the same upstream project. I'm
>> hacking software for CPE's with Danube and VRX SoC's thus I have full
>> access to hardware manuals and latest BSP's. Maybe we should merge our
>> code somehow ;)
>> Daniel
> Hi Daniel,
> i am in the middle of finishing my dma/etop rewrite. once this is done i
> think the core is ready.
> in general all contributions are welcome. question is if it is a good
> idea to merge the 2 trees now or if we merge one and then fix/add
> fetures that your tree has that mine is missing.

Actually my tree is very experimental yet so I'm going to contribute
to your tree.

> i was unable to find any public place where you keep your code. could
> you upload it somewhere so i can see what the exact differences are ?
> also could you tell me what the code base is based on ? (spinacer,
> ifxcpe, ifxmips...)
> i have so far not added vrx support due to lack of hardware to test on.
> a quick read of the docs does tell me however that only the gbit
> phy/switch and the clk needs to be adapted for vrx to also work. the
> gbit phy/switch part will already be included in my etop patches as it
> is needed by the arx series

I have an eval board with VRX288 so I could help with adding and
testing board support for that board.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>