On 11/01/11 03:44, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
> Hi John,
> after the 2.6.36 release i've started the same upstream project. I'm
> hacking software for CPE's with Danube and VRX SoC's thus I have full
> access to hardware manuals and latest BSP's. Maybe we should merge our
> code somehow ;)
i am in the middle of finishing my dma/etop rewrite. once this is done i
think the core is ready.
in general all contributions are welcome. question is if it is a good
idea to merge the 2 trees now or if we merge one and then fix/add
fetures that your tree has that mine is missing.
i was unable to find any public place where you keep your code. could
you upload it somewhere so i can see what the exact differences are ?
also could you tell me what the code base is based on ? (spinacer,
i have so far not added vrx support due to lack of hardware to test on.
a quick read of the docs does tell me however that only the gbit
phy/switch and the clk needs to be adapted for vrx to also work. the
gbit phy/switch part will already be included in my etop patches as it
is needed by the arx series