linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 00/10] MIPS: add support for Lantiq SoCs

To: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] MIPS: add support for Lantiq SoCs
From: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:07:40 +0100
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Ralph Hempel <ralph.hempel@lantiq.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <4D2BC3F7.3080006@gmail.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1294257379-417-1-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <4D2BC3F7.3080006@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100913 Icedove/3.0.7
On 11/01/11 03:44, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> after the 2.6.36 release i've started the same upstream project. I'm
> hacking software for CPE's with Danube and VRX SoC's thus I have full
> access to hardware manuals and latest BSP's. Maybe we should merge our
> code somehow ;)
>
> Daniel

Hi Daniel,

i am in the middle of finishing my dma/etop rewrite. once this is done i
think the core is ready.

in general all contributions are welcome. question is if it is a good
idea to merge the 2 trees now or if we merge one and then fix/add
fetures that your tree has that mine is missing.

i was unable to find any public place where you keep your code. could
you upload it somewhere so i can see what the exact differences are ?

also could you tell me what the code base is based on ? (spinacer,
ifxcpe, ifxmips...)

i have so far not added vrx support due to lack of hardware to test on.
a quick read of the docs does tell me however that only the gbit
phy/switch and the clk needs to be adapted for vrx to also work. the
gbit phy/switch part will already be included in my etop patches as it
is needed by the arx series

thanks,
John

thanks,
John

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>