| To: | David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 07/10] MIPS: lantiq: add NOR flash CFI address swizzle |
| From: | John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 06 Jan 2011 11:06:22 +0100 |
| Cc: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Ralph Hempel <ralph.hempel@lantiq.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org |
| In-reply-to: | <1294257379-417-8-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1294257379-417-1-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <1294257379-417-8-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100913 Icedove/3.0.7 |
On 05/01/11 20:56, John Crispin wrote: > > adr += chip->start; > +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_CFI_CMD_SWIZZLE > + adr ^= 2; > +#endif > > mutex_lock(&chip->mutex); > ret = get_chip(map, chip, adr, FL_WRITING); > Hi, What this patch essentially does is to make sure to pass a addr with the ^=2 hack already applied, so that the complex map ends up with an un swizzled addr as it applies the hack internally again. I think it would be cleanest to extend the read/write callbacks of struct map_info; with a flag indicating whether we are doing a CMD or DATA action. as the 2 following macros are used anyway, it should not be too hard to implement this. #define map_read(map, ofs) (map)->read(map, ofs) #define map_write(map, datum, ofs) (map)->write(map, datum, ofs) I am not sure however if this is the correct fix. Thanks, John |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 05/10] MIPS: lantiq: add watchdog support, John Crispin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 05/10] MIPS: lantiq: add watchdog support, Jamie Iles |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 07/10] MIPS: lantiq: add NOR flash CFI address swizzle, John Crispin |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 10/10] MIPS: lantiq: add machtypes for lantiq eval kits, John Crispin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |