El 04/11/10 19:43:08, en/na Robert Millan va escriure:
> David Daney a écrit :
> > You are claiming that all loongson2 are loongson-2f. Is that
> > really true? Or are there other types of loongson2 that are not
> > loongson-2f?
>
> I'll figure out how to distinguish them and send a new patch.
I looked at details about CPU identification, and this
seems to be broken.
See the the notes about PRId in pages 72 and 66, respectively:
http://dev.lemote.com/files/resource/documents/Loongson/ls2f/Loongson2FUserGuide.pdf
In both 2E and 2F, the implementation field is the same (0x63).
Revision field is the same too, according to docs, and it can't
be used anyway (no garantee of consistency).
I'm sending a new patch that uses machtype instead. Yes, I know
it's a bit of a kludge, but it really seems to be the only way.
> Well I appreciate consistency with GCC flag names,
Actually, I missread GCC flag (it's dashless). I'm using
"loongson2f" as David requested.
loongson2f.diff
Description: Text Data
|