linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH resend 5/9] MIPS: sync after cacheflush

To: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 5/9] MIPS: sync after cacheflush
From: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:30:52 +0900
Cc: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi.px@renesas.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=b9RXKaLqRDcA LYDQMCnIOlwgj7s=; b=eyLUwYrx38D4p/S1MMr6yN6XR5EaIINr6QM/FdkDdFUV T1M4YJQpRiqGcTrqvTdbolNcaOrAr+Jc1vlZntVfo3wBXSF8L5r3PHVqG89/GMLH X0WgbIfVpvq7geM9zkrQBH+Jo1b/h6KsEuwZtsfI2NGAZIUvm5jynikkTZfhK2A=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=message-id:date :from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ac0Pr8 Rh87ly1OwU2v6YZEjXt9z5bqTzDOwi5Z4ft6Fo5FxhS0Z66uvt9huIOfHEQLeJjg cA3ETAro4JTUw7z3XZ23QdL9FZnpUaxRUTJbOfpr585nvUlL8AmMlichfphM/6/v lMNP/WamGTl7Udy4GezAWSl/C3+uB0eg0yAk4=
In-reply-to: <AANLkTinTaW87RGUZ+o4TL8gzUPGkoR8=7C1e7aYWC9=b@mail.gmail.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <17ebecce124618ddf83ec6fe8e526f93@localhost> <17d8d27a2356640a4359f1a7dcbb3b42@localhost> <4CBC4F4E.5010305@pobox.com> <AANLkTinpry=XG-ZDgXJK-VB6QkBL2TO4-vrsV5Tc1eEs@mail.gmail.com> <4CBCE05E.20408@renesas.com> <AANLkTinTaW87RGUZ+o4TL8gzUPGkoR8=7C1e7aYWC9=b@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101005 Thunderbird/3.0.9
On 10/19/10 9:51 AM, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
Correct.  This particular system makes no guarantees that data flushed
out through CACHE operations will not overtake subsequent uncached
stores.

Thanks for the clarification, understood.  So we only need to take care
of the order of out-bound data write transactions at the processor end,
and preceding uncached load is not required here.   Sorry for the noise.

  Shinya

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>