linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH resend 6/9] MIPS: pfn_valid() is broken on low memory HIGHMEM sys

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: [PATCH resend 6/9] MIPS: pfn_valid() is broken on low memory HIGHMEM systems
From: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 14:22:35 -0700
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-reply-to: <17ebecce124618ddf83ec6fe8e526f93@localhost>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <17ebecce124618ddf83ec6fe8e526f93@localhost>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: vim 7.2
pfn_valid() compares the PFN to max_mapnr:

        __pfn >= min_low_pfn && __pfn < max_mapnr;

On HIGHMEM kernels, highend_pfn is used to set the value of max_mapnr.
Unfortunately, highend_pfn is left at zero if the system does not
actually have enough RAM to reach into the HIGHMEM range.  This causes
pfn_valid() to always return false, and when debug checks are enabled
the kernel will fail catastrophically:

Memory: 22432k/32768k available (2249k kernel code, 10336k reserved, 653k data, 
1352k init, 0k highmem)
NR_IRQS:128
kfree_debugcheck: out of range ptr 81c02900h.
Kernel bug detected[#1]:
Cpu 0
$ 0   : 00000000 10008400 00000034 00000000
$ 4   : 8003e160 802a0000 8003e160 00000000
$ 8   : 00000000 0000003e 00000747 00000747
...

On such a configuration, max_low_pfn should be used to set max_mapnr.

This was seen on 2.6.34.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
---
 arch/mips/mm/init.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/init.c b/arch/mips/mm/init.c
index 2efcbd2..18183a4 100644
--- a/arch/mips/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/mips/mm/init.c
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
 #ifdef CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM
 #error "CONFIG_HIGHMEM and CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM dont work together yet"
 #endif
-       max_mapnr = highend_pfn;
+       max_mapnr = highend_pfn ? : max_low_pfn;
 #else
        max_mapnr = max_low_pfn;
 #endif
-- 
1.7.0.4


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>