| To: | Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: siginfo difference MIPS and other arches |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Oct 2010 16:53:19 +0100 |
| Cc: | Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <AANLkTikXySeekzpYeGf6wuH5NTMxLCK_oirvBcDu4h63@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <AANLkTikXySeekzpYeGf6wuH5NTMxLCK_oirvBcDu4h63@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:16:33PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote: > current -git build breaks because of upstream commit > a337fdac7a5622d1e6547f4b476c14dfe5a2c892, which introduced > an unconditional check for siginfo_._sifields._sifault._si_addr_lsb field. > > Is there a reason why MIPS doesn't use the default siginfo_t structure > as other architectures do? History - the MIPS structure is identical to IRIX. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: How to add Ethernet and USB drivers to the Linux Kernel?, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: siginfo difference MIPS and other arches, Manuel Lauss |
| Previous by Thread: | siginfo difference MIPS and other arches, Manuel Lauss |
| Next by Thread: | Re: siginfo difference MIPS and other arches, Manuel Lauss |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |