linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

siginfo difference MIPS and other arches

To: Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: siginfo difference MIPS and other arches
From: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 16:16:33 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rr0YZv8VRPB4q2UYkePnCcuNNKAkRvcFcm2pw/nPPsk=; b=hJqyASzfW3HZn+iSkssuzeFQyVm0WPDUSjl/ddqJXNJqVytryg0kuCSJUUORHdFy14 Y3RM2fOocsVGQ6kyyqfUAjx4pcbYJQC7fAza6NV3pfEtG507oiMPCoaVciqASthf7uUD T5oyNN+MjLnDSYX+RrERU9XXkOoP/PRUkzWXc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=SZusscw2g5FF6b2cgV7TQj8lVdqmzVckAfJu/sjIJnDVObzYTpLvNZ/T9TTFg1wEqU UqNK69aEHk47uMYxRS1S9Nnu5BDp/Vll1V/6ZUnVppihc/nNo7vR9z19K8zSLpa5O0LS G+E8BP6dIYnm/j50hhfMliYdqqbgvvRthzuIw=
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Hello,

current -git build breaks because of upstream commit
a337fdac7a5622d1e6547f4b476c14dfe5a2c892, which introduced
an unconditional check for siginfo_._sifields._sifault._si_addr_lsb field.

Is there a reason why MIPS doesn't use the default siginfo_t structure
as other architectures do?

Manuel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>