linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCHv2 1/7] pwm: Add pwm core driver

To: Arun MURTHY <arun.murthy@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/7] pwm: Add pwm core driver
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:45:40 -0700
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, "lars\@metafoo.de" <lars@metafoo.de>, "kernel\@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>, "philipp.zabel\@gmail.com" <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>, "robert.jarzmik\@free.fr" <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>, "marek.vasut\@gmail.com" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>, "eric.y.miao\@gmail.com" <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>, "rpurdie\@rpsys.net" <rpurdie@rpsys.net>, "sameo\@linux.intel.com" <sameo@linux.intel.com>, "kgene.kim\@samsung.com" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, "linux-omap\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-mips\@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, STEricsson_nomadik_linux <STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com>, "bgat\@billgatliff.com" <bgat@billgatliff.com>
In-reply-to: <F45880696056844FA6A73F415B568C6953571D4F05@EXDCVYMBSTM006.EQ1STM.local> (Arun MURTHY's message of "Wed, 6 Oct 2010 06:03:28 +0200")
Organization: Deep Root Systems, LLC
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1286280002-1636-1-git-send-email-arun.murthy@stericsson.com> <1286280002-1636-2-git-send-email-arun.murthy@stericsson.com> <20101005122225.6dda30ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <F45880696056844FA6A73F415B568C6953571D4F05@EXDCVYMBSTM006.EQ1STM.local>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux)
Arun MURTHY <arun.murthy@stericsson.com> writes:

[...]

>> 
>> I suggest that you work on Kevin's comments before making any code
>> changes though.
>
> This pwm driver also supports the Davinci pwm driver as suggested by
> Kelvin.

My concern isn't whether it supports davinci or not.  Adapting existing
drivers is the easy part.

My concern is that there are now two proposals for a generic PWM
framework, and I would prefer to see that those projects are aligned
before anything merges.

Kevin

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>