linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH -mm 4/8] mips: enable ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT with (HIGHMEM &&

from [Ralf Baechle] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 4/8] mips: enable ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT with (HIGHMEM && 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR) || 64BIT
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:34:35 +0100
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <1283474956-14710-4-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
References: <20100903094753S.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1283474956-14710-4-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) 
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:49:12AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:

> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org

Looks good:

Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>

As this patch by itself doesn't make any sense in the MIPS tree and would
only cry for a janitor to remove it again I suggest you merge this with
the rest of the series.

Thanks,

  Ralf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [PATCH] MIPS: Fix syscall 64 bit number comments, Philby John
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Fix syscall 64 bit number comments, Ralf Baechle
Previous by Thread:  [PATCH -mm 4/8] mips: enable ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT with (HIGHMEM && 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR) || 64BIT, FUJITA Tomonori
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH -mm 4/8] mips: enable ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT with (HIGHMEM && 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR) || 64BIT, FUJITA Tomonori
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]