linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] MIPS: remove RELOC_HIDE on __pa_symbol

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: remove RELOC_HIDE on __pa_symbol
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:05:35 +0900
Cc: David Daney <david.s.daney@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CoQ3kCpQLF2+507Qdbf1yfproC8kw6WbRvkJMCu9drY=; b=nfz4GX7ljzOpVL++7LX97PDqbM1LyG+Jk26MoLXRHyPWMTtqsGGx38pOeGNB7sE8bE qD2da+0cqFxHifSZ1Kxo0V4joTOrJzNjk5xCq8EaiQ5gpAmK1wsf54Ow9qSXcquGJAQB ZOvt399WGNjpHffHGYf74BAZnU8/NeTrP5dhA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=qiGLEvYbqFJ9QFKNPcpEVdjAd70JwlOgX2JJLnFm17/DfXIIllbhZOuw/1VHN79qna XXF9RTkQowPsThLka4ZncGil/qs2J6P6EYogh+iTYMi35DM6T7W8zC/RYbTrq80K3DHY fdpG48KCgUA8UVhXk7GwuVuDKeSNxAecgHGj0=
In-reply-to: <20100817150035.GC17861@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1281297456-2711-1-git-send-email-namhyung@gmail.com> <4C5F8ED8.90301@gmail.com> <20100809122147.GA23053@linux-mips.org> <1281409628.1670.11.camel@leonhard> <20100817150035.GC17861@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
2010-08-17 (화), 16:00 +0100, Ralf Baechle:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:07:08PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 
> > I've sent basically same patch to x86 folks [1] and they said there is a
> > possiblility of miscompilation on gcc 3. I am not sure the same goes
> > here on mips but it might be safer to keep it. Sorry for the noise ;-(
> > 
> > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/8/138
> 
> So in a distant future when GCC 3.x will finally be retired we will be
> able to apply this patch, sigh.  I'll drop your patch for the time being
> and add a comment to the code.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
>   Ralf

FYI, the exact version introduced -f[no-]strict-overlow was gcc 4.2.

-- 
Regards,
Namhyung Kim



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>