linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] MIPS: Add device tree support to MIPS

To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] MIPS: Add device tree support to MIPS
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:33:20 +0100
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>, Dezhong Diao <dediao@cisco.com>, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, dvomlehn@cisco.com
In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=74zoQziQTmAGo-cNtF9FAT77h+KZagsNEFjEf@mail.gmail.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20100727214948.GA29241@dediao-lnx2.corp.sa.net> <AANLkTi=a=tGURpMKo7g+32LMcFovx4GJk2Wid6vmvQt8@mail.gmail.com> <4C5082BE.5050203@caviumnetworks.com> <AANLkTi=74zoQziQTmAGo-cNtF9FAT77h+KZagsNEFjEf@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 01:25:52PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:

> It would probably be best if I at least pick up the first patch into
> my test tree to give it a spin with the latest changes.  I'd be happy
> to take the 2nd too to avoid ordering issues.

Makes sense and even though this patch applies to arch/mips it's probably
more of an DT than a MIPS patch.

That said a long standing problem is that code that is relevant to MIPS
tends to get tested only if it's in one of the MIPS trees but far less in
other trees such as -next.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>