linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v2 00/26] Add support for the Ingenic JZ4740 System-on

To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/26] Add support for the Ingenic JZ4740 System-on-a-Chip
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:34:37 +0200
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Graham Gower <graham.gower@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <4C1E263E.1000903@metafoo.de>
References: <1276924111-11158-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> <20100620092610.GA4950@alpha.franken.de> <4C1E263E.1000903@metafoo.de>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 04:31:26PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> Another issue with naming is that while a component might be similar in
> JZ4730 and JZ4740 it might be completely different in a different JZ47xx
> SoC. So naming a driver 'jz47xx_driver' instead of 'jz4740_driver' wont
> work either.

so ? call it xx for the common part an exact number for special part.
It might be just jugglin with pieces, but getting it better in the first
run is always a plus.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>