| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: About MIPS specific dma_mmap_coherent() |
| From: | Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 May 2010 14:42:08 +0800 |
| Cc: | Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rY0KVxgZCoXOKE9L54+y3Kg6fmVr+QNl5vMnCMLVyPs=; b=BkipMLXw+vnYIwM5fbjAmVLcs2Zdw9rEDhb30f0bGEOBH9oDMFlFPyfj7lrQ02FQV+ ew/eRXnlvoVWtnTkp9KyZNOga/0gszN4nLqFGcdYyNoS8/MY9Mt+SLnE5RgvwFR/fbIr EXGzikmuWJuuywRa0dP64npnBwIovc6YXCkP4= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :organization:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=IZC4W75ucmX5wWPUd+Uyqb3i79d0AhO1SBjNQHITf4imwwY17WumWZ82V8GPAMumCu TJWBfq9h06hWeX9r5y7WhjjHw1NvJ/H11ony+ehzRNh3qHu4RwYErL/J0uDmmzGrjxHq fZ6fS/AIgSo/lqqxrGT352o6l1TEO6GyQp5GU= |
| In-reply-to: | <20100511184844.GA7978@linux-mips.org> |
| Organization: | DSLab, Lanzhou University, China |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1271134735.25797.35.camel@falcon> <s5hmxx7z4a7.wl%tiwai@suse.de> <1271218889.25872.27.camel@falcon> <s5hzl164kay.wl%tiwai@suse.de> <1271235619.25872.148.camel@falcon> <s5h633uxcje.wl%tiwai@suse.de> <20100511184844.GA7978@linux-mips.org> |
| Reply-to: | wuzhangjin@gmail.com |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
Hi, Ralf & Takashi On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:48 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 05:46:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > But, I remember vaguely that calling pgprot_noncached() > > unconditionally is dangerous. It should be checked somehow, e.g. via > > platform_device_is_coherent(). And, this found only in > > dma-coherence.h, and adding it to pcm_native.c would become messy like > > below... > > > > So, it'd be really better to add dma_mmap_coherent(), indeed. > > We agreed that this was only meant as a stop gap meassure. As such I do > agree with either of > > http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/1117/ > http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/1118/ > > Wu has tested the 1117 patch so that might make it preferable especially > for 2.6.34 if we should go for that. > Just tested 1118, it works too ;) Regards, Wu Zhangjin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] Restore signalling NaN behaviour for abs.[sd], Chris Dearman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: About MIPS specific dma_mmap_coherent(), Takashi Iwai |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: About MIPS specific dma_mmap_coherent(), Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: About MIPS specific dma_mmap_coherent(), Takashi Iwai |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |