| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Unexpected behaviour when catching SIGFPE on FPU-less system |
| From: | "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@paralogos.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 04 May 2010 11:58:29 -0700 |
| Cc: | Shane McDonald <mcdonald.shane@gmail.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=paralogos.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=WPK27LMTCp/yrI9KeJ2UB1/OwONMj2e12OX4Ld0XHOUEi3+KRRoCvu9uhNyjP4WhUlrZxHkTS2QL/e3JpcVZCBPSFrZQVe+nBjX0Ce72LBUO0Mab0OpVUNmTD4umZWNI; |
| In-reply-to: | <20100504184457.GA21929@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <E1O8lDn-0000Sk-86@localhost> <4BDF366E.5000501@paralogos.com> <k2hb2b2f2321005031843l87f39f36h960153cae3ec5020@mail.gmail.com> <4BDF8092.1060401@paralogos.com> <n2pb2b2f2321005032049h56cd72ceh3ac7120c547b59c5@mail.gmail.com> <n2rb2b2f2321005032135ze807a2aft8811a7937288de53@mail.gmail.com> <m2rb2b2f2321005032356j854934d9v42a9e50683b085a8@mail.gmail.com> <4BE00207.6030506@paralogos.com> <m2zb2b2f2321005040556g80eed954p7ac11e2cd05921c6@mail.gmail.com> <4BE0479E.6060506@paralogos.com> <20100504184457.GA21929@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) |
Ralf Baechle wrote: Yes, that's it! I used to run it all the time when I was working on SMTC FPU support. Shane, does it work on your system with the emulator??On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:13:18AM -0700, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:What we used to use was what I *thought* was an old public domain program whose name was an English word that had something to do with being exacting. Googling with obvious keywords didn't turn it up.Is it paranoia by any chance? Paranoia is available as single files at: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/software/ieee/paranoia.c http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/software/ieee/paranoia.h It's ages that soembody last ran it but last known status is that there were no paranoia fault. /K. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Unexpected behaviour when catching SIGFPE on FPU-less system, Kevin D. Kissell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Unexpected behaviour when catching SIGFPE on FPU-less system, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Unexpected behaviour when catching SIGFPE on FPU-less system, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Unexpected behaviour when catching SIGFPE on FPU-less system, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |