| To: | Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Calculate proper ebase value for 64-bit kernels |
| From: | Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:13:55 +0800 |
| Cc: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LWJ03z8zRf70fhkm1yYLfVLdgcf9mrEI05CXl6H0c7M=; b=li+PyiRBkiJtJYiwO/06awog1ZTLWRA+I4uY52IvroZhXE9oUhvVY1EbFYOapekdk+ 9ULUvqBa1UsIoMrCaAM5nbi5i5erozqQeWE3kDHtP0VCTQr2Zlp+PO9h7g9Is9GBudTq tBOdhZy8/0OYqXZf7Jbzc0NiQHIq1xdOVJbtY= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :organization:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=UZ3wKOFgtlwihzfEzaTN91NKxvR6FPt4MVo3aA/B+JffsFmDCOjffcW76KAbhvGZjA 78bm4+Nwve4tVxCVrJeO1u0QoybBCJiegsjfnr60TsYW4F3yOfJtR6Q7K61aa4wmVCHv cVo4hlxrDS25THCd4zptvs4z7lE+ExRKiVLu0= |
| In-reply-to: | <20100414112458.GA8861@alpha.franken.de> |
| Organization: | DSLab, Lanzhou University, China |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1270585790-12730-1-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <1271135034.25797.41.camel@falcon> <20100413073435.GA6371@alpha.franken.de> <20100413171610.GA16578@linux-mips.org> <1271232185.25872.142.camel@falcon> <20100414112458.GA8861@alpha.franken.de> |
| Reply-to: | wuzhangjin@gmail.com |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 13:24 +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:03:05PM +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > If using CKSEG0 as the ebase, CKSEG0 is defined as 0xffffffff80000000,
> > then we get the address: 0x97ffffff80000100, is this address ok?
>
> the address is broken TO_UNCAC doesn't work properly for CKSEG0 addresses.
> And that's IMHO the real bug... I'm wondering whether this
> set_uncached_handler() stunt is even needed. Is there a machine
> where CKSEG0 and CKSEG1 address different memory ? If not, we could
> just use the normal set_handler() function and be done with it.
>
Hi, all
I'm not familiar with this part, is there any fixup/workaround for this
bug? otherwise, we will get a broken support for the r4k machines(at
least the loongson machines).
Regards,
Wu Zhangjin
|
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] Loongson: Oprofile: Enable it when CONFIG_OPROFILE=m, Wu Zhangjin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Cavium mips64 perf counters, Giant Sand Fan's |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Calculate proper ebase value for 64-bit kernels, Thomas Bogendoerfer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Calculate proper ebase value for 64-bit kernels, David Daney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |