linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] ftrace porting of linux-2.6.29 for mips

To: wu zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace porting of linux-2.6.29 for mips
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:40:57 +0100
In-reply-to: <20090403141158.GA27751@adriano.hkcable.com.hk>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <b00321320904021847w5ab3acb6nd1cd554c251ef8f6@mail.gmail.com> <20090403113315.GC6629@adriano.hkcable.com.hk> <b00321320904030503w8fe0165t2aded6727f35e24c@mail.gmail.com> <b00321320904030551p774d295lce3581c23d9d8c26@mail.gmail.com> <20090403141158.GA27751@adriano.hkcable.com.hk>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 10:11:59PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:

> BTW, it seems linux-mips@vger.kernel.org is not an alias of
> linux-mips@linux-mips.org, since I haven't seen our previous emails appear in
> linux-mips ML's archive. So I have added linux-mips@linux-mips.org to CC list.

No, as far as I can say that list is dead.  It's years that the list last
came to my attention and actually I thought it had been deleted as duplicate
lists for essentially the same purpose are causing confusing and postings
going down the drain unnoticed.

Any of you subscribed there, is there activity?

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>