| To: | Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Reverting old hack |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:41:27 +0100 |
| Cc: | Yoichi Yuasa <yuasa@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <201002240959.56706.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20100220113134.GA27194@linux-mips.org> <20100224090333.44a16d0a.yuasa@linux-mips.org> <20100224164100.GD5130@linux-mips.org> <201002240959.56706.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) |
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 09:59:56AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > There is another somewhat theoretical correctness issue. Because the > > VIA SuperIO chip only decodes 24 bits of address space but port address > > space currently being configured as 32MB there is the theoretical > > possibility of I/O port addresses that alias with legacy addresses getting > > allocated. > > Does this mean my comment: > > + * but the VT82C586 IDE controller does respond at 0x100001f0 because > + * it only decodes the low 16 bits of the address. > > should say "24 bits" instead of "16 bits"? Yes, afair. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Optimize spinlocks., David Daney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RFC: [MIPS] BCM1480/BCM1480HT remove io_offset, Bjorn Helgaas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Reverting old hack, Bjorn Helgaas |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Reverting old hack, Benjamin Herrenschmidt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |