| To: | David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] MIPS: crazy spinlock speed test. |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:55:38 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <1266362795-20199-1-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1266362795-20199-1-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) |
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:26:35PM -0800, David Daney wrote: > This is just a test program for raw_spinlocks. The main reason I > wrote it is to validate my spinlock changes that I sent in a previous > patch. > > To use it enable CONFIG_DEBUG_FS and CONFIG_SPINLOCK_TEST then at run > time do: > > # mount -t debugfs none /sys/kernel/debug/ > # cat /sys/kernel/debug/mips/spin_single > # cat /sys/kernel/debug/mips/spin_multi > > On my 600MHz octeon cn5860 (16 CPUs) I get > > spin_single spin_multi > base 106885 247941 > spinlock_patch 75194 219465 > > This shows that for uncontended locks the spinlock patch gives 41% > improvement and for contended locks 12% improvement (1/time). > > Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> Also queued for 2.6.34. Thanks! Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Optimize spinlocks., Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Reverting old hack, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] MIPS: crazy spinlock speed test., David Daney |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 0/2] Staging: Clean up octeon Ethernet some., David Daney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |