linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v5] Virtual memory size detection for 64 bit MIPS CPUs

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Virtual memory size detection for 64 bit MIPS CPUs
From: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:49:49 +0200
Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=j+YRzQop0cnP/ogiHMfiqcuL7p6Ovef3oy8qyyPkxpk=; b=aquum+FF2yoFaKY77TnRUEjLCjl/pOdKTRojnIt33UhuDZum78J+4zZ9B8pE2NHmcY h9I3E4GnEPsL3ObQJKgJ7/OhoDEZz+InkqguhNIJ8fwjtPJ78E/479BgIM2FZALpooUn z1FpdHVfFaKWKKjhJNfIELVEq6RGUmvgyv9Sw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ADJ0U658exe4rqWwZyhGtfHq+sALqXOoO7jitxYhzwom5mCgp97ogErnNRcRvthn/o 5BGDmwMDC6iKMFQHWiT53M1VtJMV9DuPjyDjjGAb3sea0QtWvt9Ui0XKSyQ7t+5MZina 6+52qxQX7Bac+jeSmcbV/RVjuIv1Pearvd9Mo=
In-reply-to: <20100202134613.GD13987@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1265107061-18355-1-git-send-email-guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> <20100202130153.GB10837@linux-mips.org> <90edad821002020505x6ecfd03ejb03f316d9859b9db@mail.gmail.com> <20100202131015.GB13987@linux-mips.org> <90edad821002020534s54c4120atb7ac183f39d44847@mail.gmail.com> <20100202134613.GD13987@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:34:31PM +0200, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
>
>> >> I haven't been following this closely enough, so maybe my question is
>> >> stupid. However: will this work on SGI R5000? I'm using an Indy, so
>> >> I'm quite concerned about this CPU.
>> >
>> > The point is that your Indy right now is not working with a 64-bit kernel 
>> > :)
>>
>> I know. :)
>>
>> What I was asking about was whether my Indy is going to work with the
>> new scheme of calculating VMALLOC_END.
>
> Of course it will.

OK, thanks!

Dmitri

>
>  Ralf
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>