linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v5] Virtual memory size detection for 64 bit MIPS CPUs

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Virtual memory size detection for 64 bit MIPS CPUs
From: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:34:31 +0200
Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZhDOqbP4kckl3CPUFt5mVwrLiBx78az/wWrYrXoLdyw=; b=dpHNgn9eOQnYMgM0uM8lqoNljCLoEleYAEI15Ypc+mbdF2gvfPzbvfXVLkmOEKaPHA IJyAoF4kkc0Nbp689Ai9O5miaNfZBKTIy1yl0wqAY9qAhaDgsXznuVPaQN1gWr5u1UVV 8ihjCSdMlo4E7/SfguQP120JK+Am5gI/5U+ME=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VogBmfmuEmeR9GkhyZxXYEPwSfUN3EqBe5r7AuPkEiVlfZVj+40Pcra3hOsJ/jRhxq qZXV3XgmmlvOxJRcoFKjHboJKt1mliTD/u87lEnuJa37pU2MOrj+wQWpiZ05kRVM3xzQ 0ApJ1LYmpaIB6RSMt9jpmmVdMwkW/tpQSb92A=
In-reply-to: <20100202131015.GB13987@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1265107061-18355-1-git-send-email-guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> <20100202130153.GB10837@linux-mips.org> <90edad821002020505x6ecfd03ejb03f316d9859b9db@mail.gmail.com> <20100202131015.GB13987@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:05:49PM +0200, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:37:41AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> >
>> > Pretty good, let the nitpicking start :-)
>>
>> I haven't been following this closely enough, so maybe my question is
>> stupid. However: will this work on SGI R5000? I'm using an Indy, so
>> I'm quite concerned about this CPU.
>
> The point is that your Indy right now is not working with a 64-bit kernel :)

I know. :)

What I was asking about was whether my Indy is going to work with the
new scheme of calculating VMALLOC_END.

Dmitri

>
>  Ralf
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>