[Top] [All Lists]

Re: some question about Extended Asm

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <>
Subject: Re: some question about Extended Asm
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:17:35 +0100
Cc: loody <>, Linux MIPS Mailing List <>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7sVBBMv9Pg2LoNYLESgn8SRgmPIog48xF1CjS7e3lrg=; b=TXNMp4nJCMvWzKR0KpNDMjy3tO2uriOuhZT0HrlRg2P8OzCvTotvCOKFf8gP07C8gC muDmk5lqxDmLYNElkW5lzROLYtPuKNB5JaFFgnj0GIZSfYtDvwpBHmTF1aB4K59jEBbA jMrx5hWjMbZHKP7zf1ukyqZsjEf0fA2L3fN6A=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=cz7EOMMdo2XVBvgc6WL1uAQa9ABroo0Ar76vWERtMZp6BLH4lvwByhYJmp7Ah/UJsr Zlw04vg1G6fOaXSuRmW6aW/PTKfLqQKpKZ2lWfKqZzmwyLLZ2tP7K7HS8a8Qpf/0AI0g 6EPNEL9lXmHUoEPxnBntUGAYN6kghgzvVfU9w=
In-reply-to: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 18:14, Maciej W. Rozycki <> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, loody wrote:
>> I have some question about extended assembly in mips
>> 1. is mips assembly in AT&T syntax?
>>     from the document I google from the web, they emphasize that the
>> GNU C compiler use AT&T syntax, and they list some example about intel
>> instructions.
>  I'm not sure if the "AT&T syntax" term has any meaning except for Intel
> architecture processors.

It also affects m68k, IIRC.



Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                                            -- Linus Torvalds

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>