linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] MIPS: Alchemy: irq: use runtime CPU type detection

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MIPS: Alchemy: irq: use runtime CPU type detection
From: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:36:08 +0100
Cc: Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5dynzYV19RvLdJgeAscN0MhR+YlrK8dajRYZ0Ygu8UI=; b=sMH+DYrh255pyKPEKivZf94bs0Ps5g5jon/+v+VW+3z+nrZ4Y3OkQCCrY+PZkrUbRs VZdNx9kV6NTysQoxpepJSsV+NNFEdfWmCgn7paslDxsWAwL0/XKg5mBGPvDJe6boOYTT 2LXax8Bg4YGdRlx+tHCVvY3c0RCkmApBU0HNY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Pwilx3OgIVh1sc2S97asEc5nKlLN9IWx68pAveimGi9nZ0mBS2QxafPOTEhGDQZy5e IEhfxDz3oCzz/S/A7tuOMPWz2Zk+vt9A+Pk/xBDyeSj/XYVjlfpabZfeJllkPRS9eK3c 79euDZCz7pYBNWHyCgNu6prAd+f3i1JzCPwTY=
In-reply-to: <20091123231740.GC27817@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1259005202-7771-1-git-send-email-manuel.lauss@gmail.com> <1259005202-7771-2-git-send-email-manuel.lauss@gmail.com> <1259005202-7771-3-git-send-email-manuel.lauss@gmail.com> <20091123231740.GC27817@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:40:02PM +0100, Manuel Lauss wrote:
>
>> Use runtime CPU detection instead of relying on preprocessor symbols.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks, queued for 2.6.33.

Thank you.  Could you also please rename the file from "irq.c" to "irq-au1000.c"
(and fix the Makefile).  The new name better reflects what type of CPU it is
supposed to work with. I'd send a patch, but I figure doing a "git mv" on your
end is faster and preserves the history of the file.

Thanks!
     Manuel Lauss

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>