linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v9 03/10] tracing: add an endian argument to scripts/recordmc

To: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/10] tracing: add an endian argument to scripts/recordmcount.pl
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:20:39 +0000
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>, zhangfx@lemote.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Wu Zhangjin <wuzj@lemote.com>
In-reply-to: <267c0824194b659b46fc038ba43492df30369fec.1258719323.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <cover.1258719323.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com> <267c0824194b659b46fc038ba43492df30369fec.1258719323.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 08:34:31PM +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote:

> From: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
> 
> MIPS and some other architectures need this argument to handle
> big/little endian respectively.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzj@lemote.com>

This one is a bit problematic because you seem to have generated the
patch against linux-next but I'm applying it on the MIPS -queue tree and
some other changes on -next are now resulting in a conflict.  And
Steven Rostedt is going to merge a few more changes which he says will
conflict.

So I put this patch on the queue tree but may not propagate it immediately
to linux-next.

Thanks!

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>