Re: [PATCH -queue v0 4/6] [loongson] add basic fuloong2f support

[Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>]

On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 14:16 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 05:05:47PM +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/loongson/fuloong-2f/irq.c 
> > b/arch/mips/loongson/fuloong-2f/irq.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..22c45fd
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/mips/loongson/fuloong-2f/irq.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2007 Lemote Inc.
> > + * Author: Fuxin Zhang, zhangfx@lemote.com
> > + *
> > + *  This program is free software; you can redistribute  it and/or modify 
> > it
> > + *  under  the terms of  the GNU General  Public License as published by 
> > the
> > + *  Free Software Foundation;  either version 2 of the  License, or (at 
> > your
> > + *  option) any later version.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +
> > +#include <asm/irq_cpu.h>
> > +#include <asm/i8259.h>
> > +#include <asm/mipsregs.h>
> > +
> > +#include <loongson.h>
> > +#include <machine.h>
> > +
> > +#define LOONGSON_TIMER_IRQ (MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE + 7) /* cpu timer */
> > +#define LOONGSON_PERFCNT_IRQ       (MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE + 6) /* cpu perf 
> > counter */
> > +#define LOONGSON_NORTH_BRIDGE_IRQ  (MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE + 6) /* bonito */
> > +#define LOONGSON_UART_IRQ  (MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE + 3) /* cpu serial port */
> > +#define LOONGSON_SOUTH_BRIDGE_IRQ  (MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE + 2) /* i8259 */
> > +
> > +#define LOONGSON_INT_BIT_INT0              (1 << 11)
> > +#define LOONGSON_INT_BIT_INT1              (1 << 12)
> > +
> > +static int mach_i8259_irq(void)
> > +{
> > +   int irq, isr, imr;
> > +
> > +   irq = -1;
> > +
> > +   if ((LOONGSON_INTISR & LOONGSON_INTEN) & LOONGSON_INT_BIT_INT0) {
> > +           imr = inb(0x21) | (inb(0xa1) << 8);
> > +           isr = inb(0x20) | (inb(0xa0) << 8);
> > +           isr &= ~0x4;    /* irq2 for cascade */
> > +           isr &= ~imr;
> > +           irq = ffs(isr) - 1;
> > +   }
> 
> Any reason why you're not using i8259_irq() from <asm/i8259.h> here?
> That function not only gets the locking right, it also minimizes the number
> of accesses to the i8259 - which even on modern silicon can be stuningly
> slow.
> 

Hi, Ralf

Just asked Yanhua, He told me there is a bug in cs5536, if using the
i8259_irq() directly, we can not get the irq. and just tried it, the
kernel hang on booting.

Regards,
        Wu Zhangjin