| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH -queue v0 1/6] [loongson] add basic loongson-2f support |
| From: | Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:00:16 +0800 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, huhb@lemote.com, yanh@lemote.com, Zhang Le <r0bertz@gentoo.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>, zhangfx@lemote.com, liujl@lemote.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6Evv75u8IcigLRiZzwe7eQnrurGzgfgEc+JVowntnjA=; b=wZcpTwxVyLmOV5FTkdGHHBKyHlG5qN1ZOawIzR84tMXvFMKc5PJsNitucUqbzyefGZ QPHWkE6z7EfLB+YuohEqeBhn1FsWwrrsu/CUbznpdSj1UETqgHchQOsDLBTbFEWBQeYG kfwGLJZJCNswpJM435hqcbXUDFA1wuUGnETMg= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :organization:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=A96k0644QFIW7fu/LVrJpXom+9PmlIr1qXcqr5blYY4/wxEfxz6TrVUybH1NIUyn46 lzWTAFTjbPPZyAEJQz7lL+ykelc9c+/KHrSv40geklWBlxZdmec0H9aVX+D4d0O9Olrg MwZES9X5uZQGTvMHgIiFHShBS2UQK3KjNREiU= |
| In-reply-to: | <20091105102838.GF12582@linux-mips.org> |
| Organization: | DSLab, Lanzhou University, China |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cover.1257325319.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com> <a1bd2470bc465e505281c761adca8c2287d102b3.1257325319.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com> <20091105091841.GC12582@linux-mips.org> <1257414523.1824.11.camel@falcon.domain.org> <20091105102838.GF12582@linux-mips.org> |
| Reply-to: | wuzhangjin@gmail.com |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
Hi,
> > > You're ifdefing on Loongson 2F - doesn't that mean that you can't have a
> > > kernel that supports both Loongson 2E and 2F?
> > >
> >
> > Currently, not consider it yet;) It's a little hard to cope with, should
> > we consider it at this moment? if yes, I will try it with the help of
> > exisiting machtype asap. but I think it's better to let it be the future
> > job ;)
>
> Fair enough - though I'm sure Linux distributions would be happy to have
> one kernel variant less to ship.
>
Yup, linux distributions will like it.
but just remembered that: the instruciton set of loongson2e and
loongson2f is different, -march=loongson2e, -march=loongson2f. so it
will be not possible to merge them together, but I will try to merge the
2f support, so please wait for me merging fuloong2f & yeeloon2f, I will
do it tonight, it is really an interesting job to do ;)
Regards,
Wu Zhangjin
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH -queue v0 1/6] [loongson] add basic loongson-2f support, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH -queue v0 4/6] [loongson] add basic fuloong2f support, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH -queue v0 1/6] [loongson] add basic loongson-2f support, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH -queue v0 2/6] [loongson] oprofile: avoid do_IRQ for perfcounter when the interrupt is from bonito, Wu Zhangjin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |