linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH -queue v0 1/6] [loongson] add basic loongson-2f support

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -queue v0 1/6] [loongson] add basic loongson-2f support
From: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:00:16 +0800
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, huhb@lemote.com, yanh@lemote.com, Zhang Le <r0bertz@gentoo.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>, zhangfx@lemote.com, liujl@lemote.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6Evv75u8IcigLRiZzwe7eQnrurGzgfgEc+JVowntnjA=; b=wZcpTwxVyLmOV5FTkdGHHBKyHlG5qN1ZOawIzR84tMXvFMKc5PJsNitucUqbzyefGZ QPHWkE6z7EfLB+YuohEqeBhn1FsWwrrsu/CUbznpdSj1UETqgHchQOsDLBTbFEWBQeYG kfwGLJZJCNswpJM435hqcbXUDFA1wuUGnETMg=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :organization:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=A96k0644QFIW7fu/LVrJpXom+9PmlIr1qXcqr5blYY4/wxEfxz6TrVUybH1NIUyn46 lzWTAFTjbPPZyAEJQz7lL+ykelc9c+/KHrSv40geklWBlxZdmec0H9aVX+D4d0O9Olrg MwZES9X5uZQGTvMHgIiFHShBS2UQK3KjNREiU=
In-reply-to: <20091105102838.GF12582@linux-mips.org>
Organization: DSLab, Lanzhou University, China
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <cover.1257325319.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com> <a1bd2470bc465e505281c761adca8c2287d102b3.1257325319.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com> <20091105091841.GC12582@linux-mips.org> <1257414523.1824.11.camel@falcon.domain.org> <20091105102838.GF12582@linux-mips.org>
Reply-to: wuzhangjin@gmail.com
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Hi,

> > > You're ifdefing on Loongson 2F - doesn't that mean that you can't have a
> > > kernel that supports both Loongson 2E and 2F?
> > > 
> > 
> > Currently, not consider it yet;) It's a little hard to cope with, should
> > we consider it at this moment? if yes, I will try it with the help of
> > exisiting machtype asap. but I think it's better to let it be the future
> > job ;)
> 
> Fair enough - though I'm sure Linux distributions would be happy to have
> one kernel variant less to ship.
> 

Yup, linux distributions will like it.

but just remembered that: the instruciton set of loongson2e and
loongson2f is different, -march=loongson2e, -march=loongson2f. so it
will be not possible to merge them together, but I will try to merge the
2f support, so please wait for me merging fuloong2f & yeeloon2f, I will
do it tonight, it is really an interesting job to do ;)

Regards,
        Wu Zhangjin


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>