| To: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/8] arch/mips/txx9: introduce missing kfree, iounmap |
| From: | Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:47:26 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20090916.004525.74746264.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20090914.003321.160496287.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909132113520.31000@ask.diku.dk> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909150701170.11392@ask.diku.dk> <20090916.004525.74746264.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:03:42 +0200 (CEST), Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> wrote: > > > +out_pdev: > > > + platform_device_put(pdev); > > > +out_gpio: > > > + gpio_remove(&iocled->chip); > > > > I just noticed that the prototype of gpio_remove has __must_check > > I don't think there is anything to check here; since the thing is not > > fully initialized here, it is unlikely to be busy. Should there be (void) > > in front of it? > > The void casting does not silence the warning. How about this? > > if (gpiochip_remove(&iocled->chip)) > return; > > In general, memory leak would be less serious than crash or data > corruption ;) OK, I will send an updated patch shortly. julia |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/8] arch/mips/txx9: introduce missing kfree, iounmap, Atsushi Nemoto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/8] arch/mips/txx9: introduce missing kfree, iounmap, Julia Lawall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/8] arch/mips/txx9: introduce missing kfree, iounmap, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/8] arch/mips/txx9: introduce missing kfree, iounmap, Julia Lawall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |