| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Machine check exception in kmap_coherent() |
| From: | Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:28:05 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sozatdNewOWwECRibP9qaU47jH3DVLRnapILv5bPyv4=; b=JMMUxiduwuyIP/xXZWqjj36JXj5j9u4XcFTFxRlFeiqVibjDmOzL+j7vYl8t6Kxtvk KQwvmiBYtoFLmWit32XBQemKd+Te78IIBxCnQaStZlJscZspk1vsKdoHffhptwV02RD3 zpAQBLrJSTAuif6z70p7A8idPcI/40NmRA++0= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vjXXJMpY7DYcGb4oowmgSY6+bKBfMm2b8oXi8w/QWS+EK4a/8Re99/C5Xy/JC0214r q1P3jjxPCvNn16PjDFROluRT0ETnqthRKEDsm0nObSDRhz0RiFZ6xT//lGyPxZr9fXMb kO0W7kX+KZXCACC5dMq1zg6mi0iaM3ZCYTqo0= |
| In-reply-to: | <20090907102613.GA25295@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <197625223d8cb6ec3fc3e7da4501dd65@localhost> <20090907102613.GA25295@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Ralf Baechle<ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote: > Too complicated. The fault is happening because the non-SMTC code is trying > to be terribly clever and pre-loading the TLB with a new wired entry. On > SMTC where multiple processors are sharing a single TLB are more careful > approach is needed so the code does a TLB probe and carefully and re-uses > an existing entry, if any. Which happens to be just what we need. > > So how about below - only compile tested - patch? That is an interesting idea. However, I am not sure we want the IPI ISR to overwrite copy_user_highpage()'s TLB entry. That means that when the interrupt returns, our coherent mapping will likely point to a different page. It will avoid the machine check exception, but it will potentially cause silent, intermittent data corruption instead. Taking another cue from the SMTC implementation, though - my v2 patch adds an extra set of fixmap addresses for the in_interrupt() case, avoiding the VA conflict entirely. What do you think? I tested this scheme on non-SMTC. I suspect that the same change is required for MT + MP cores like the 1004K, but probably not MT only cores like 34K which don't use cacheop IPIs. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCHv2] MIPS: Machine check exception in kmap_coherent(), Kevin Cernekee |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [MIPS] TLB handler fix for vmalloc'ed addresses, Maxim Uvarov |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCHv2] MIPS: Machine check exception in kmap_coherent(), Kevin Cernekee |
| Next by Thread: | [MIPS] TLB handler fix for vmalloc'ed addresses, Maxim Uvarov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |