linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Alchemy: multiple timer base address support

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Alchemy: multiple timer base address support
From: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:01:11 +0200
Cc: Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=i0zIStESLgPSXir5RyuhKO6iY4sJ+gdCKI0F7o+tCVY=; b=P6fEVIlO4QwMo9FyV2x9x8/FWKvpp3adibetAmmBHss9buWUL3Ki17rT/g0ZqV4x71 4jRQK52SH9YzPd7Sk4FND7/0RJONB/l/Vy3eHL8mUD6YQI+je9xOBljy+LW3tNwjuPto Z6+ysL3UDbXPp5fs2WT8LKvWEmmLpgjCbwqQI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qCgXyvz1eOw+kfRAHtTh5beVBJfTSOK+rAXNUTxhkDOlWsLp6VramLNJYgehdwZrb4 3VzpHNHXlK6ZoKBEsRX5DWYYX++lK17vCX/GDdaqWeG/zwD3PDDiDA8tRNMk8BfGg3oX H9iVaBbRljU8WW1cFAtHFcbanV/k8MXsNjuuc=
In-reply-to: <20090827114907.GD29984@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1250957401-14447-1-git-send-email-manuel.lauss@gmail.com> <20090827114907.GD29984@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Ralf Baechle<ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 06:09:59PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
>> From: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:09:59 +0200
>> To: Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
>>       Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
>> Cc: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Alchemy: multiple timer base address support
>
> Ah, I missed the "RFC" in the subject line.  Lemme know if you want me to
> keep this in -queue or yank it out.

Please yank it for now, I'll resend diffed against -queue at a later date.

Manuel Lauss

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>