linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/4] au1000_eth platform device/driver conversion

To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] au1000_eth platform device/driver conversion
From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:13:59 +0200
Cc: sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, manuel.lauss@googlemail.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=IAbgbRCJoWNYc1NADycyVpGUVTXe+WLmV1wlgip4nTQ=; b=HoR8z9c/+mLx+RjISxEPfzdM8nC7K70SSteqrhGaF1gg4WkEiWbtpl5ArS4lEXXGlM AyjwdnxM3+j2uGoSTIkDlFRWTSgdkCSqp39qdehyJwO+ziEnOBhpNiJczx4RMShnppMb e1jsyMk73n3RQ9J4J7YCTpgU0/qslrOjKr/k8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=gHw/czTNgeMaqyDAQdI9ZEcScxYWU4aSlnPrBJiwfpI74MdqFPxLGzonFvagg1Y87o OnkaVk34p1EQjUic5wPo8AbXPJ/0bA6YxPlOSYhtvpB1uvw4XgJnln8A4D4TUZuP/QNn lUjhx5Yj3fLxJx0IbmKQdCcOqtD+DVhxbq6m0=
In-reply-to: <20090730.131000.259116391.davem@davemloft.net>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <200907282300.07144.florian@openwrt.org> <4A71F8FD.3060002@ru.mvista.com> <20090730.131000.259116391.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: KMail/1.9.9
Hi,

Le Thursday 30 July 2009 22:10:00 David Miller, vous avez écrit :
> From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:48:13 +0400
>
> >   Because they were only posted to linux-mips. And we didn't see #2 and
> >   #4 in linux-mips either.
>
> That's not going to work.
>
> You can't apply some of these patches to one tree, and some to
> the other.  That leaves the driver in a half-baked state in BOTH
> trees during the entire development period.

Sorry about that I did not want to "spam" netdev with MIPS specific bits as I 
know those specific changes would lead to a discussion for sure.

>
> So one of the two trees has to be chosen and all 4 patches added
> there, and there only.

Ok, I got to respin them to address some comments on the MIPS-side anyway and 
will not forget to CC netdev and you this time.
-- 
Best regards, Florian Fainelli
Email: florian@openwrt.org
Web: http://openwrt.org
IRC: [florian] on irc.freenode.net
-------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>