Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Sunday 26 July 2009, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:39:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > Yes, they would.  In general, you'd probably want to do something like this:
> 
> > static struct dev_pm_ops au1xmmc_pmops = {
> >     .resume         = au1xmmc_resume,
> >     .suspend                = au1xmmc_suspend,
> >     .freeze         = au1xmmc_resume,
> >     .thaw           = au1xmmc_suspend,
> 
> I'd have expected freeze and thaw to be the other way around here?

Sure, sorry.

.suspend() corresponds to .freeze() and .poweroff(), while .resume()
corresponds to .thaw() and .restore().

Best,
Rafael