| To: | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion |
| From: | Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> |
| Date: | Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:18:58 +0200 |
| Cc: | Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <20090725174449.GC14062@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1248275919-3296-1-git-send-email-manuel.lauss@gmail.com> <20090725174449.GC14062@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9.9 |
On Saturday 25 July 2009, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:18:39PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> > Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
> > Signed-off-by: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>
> >
> > +
> > +static struct dev_pm_ops au1xmmc_pmops = {
> > + .resume = au1xmmc_resume,
> > + .suspend = au1xmmc_suspend,
> > +};
> > +
>
> Was suspend to disk tested? It requires freeze()/thaw().
Is that a regression introduced by this patch then? If so, many more of
the recent dev_pm_ops conversion patches would need to be revisited.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion, Manuel Lauss |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion, Dmitry Torokhov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion, Manuel Lauss |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion, Dmitry Torokhov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |