linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion

To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:18:58 +0200
Cc: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <20090725174449.GC14062@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1248275919-3296-1-git-send-email-manuel.lauss@gmail.com> <20090725174449.GC14062@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: KMail/1.9.9
On Saturday 25 July 2009, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:18:39PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> > Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
> > Signed-off-by: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>
> >
> > +
> > +static struct dev_pm_ops au1xmmc_pmops = {
> > +   .resume         = au1xmmc_resume,
> > +   .suspend        = au1xmmc_suspend,
> > +};
> > +
>
> Was suspend to disk tested? It requires freeze()/thaw().

Is that a regression introduced by this patch then? If so, many more of 
the recent dev_pm_ops conversion patches would need to be revisited.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>