linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [PATCH 2/5] Extend IPI handling to CPU number

To: "'Ralf Baechle'" <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/5] Extend IPI handling to CPU number
From: "Tim Anderson" <tanderson@mvista.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:36:08 -0700
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <20090617081412.GB13467@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Thread-index: AcnvI7gybdWEttWyQ3e4/AZP9ua9BAAPX74w
Ralf,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralf Baechle [mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 1:14 AM
> To: Tim Anderson
> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Extend IPI handling to CPU number
> 
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 04:58:28PM -0700, Tim Anderson wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/irq-gic.c b/arch/mips/kernel/irq-gic.c
> > index 1d6ac92..5cf003d 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/irq-gic.c
> > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/irq-gic.c
> > @@ -245,6 +245,10 @@ static void __init gic_basic_init(void)
> >             if (cpu == X)
> >                     continue;
> >  
> > +           if (cpu == 0 && i != 0 && _intrmap[i].intrnum == 0 &&
> > +                    _intrmap[i].ipiflag == 0)
>                         ^
>                         wrong indentation

Good Point I will correct this and resubmit.

> 
> > +                   continue;
> > +
> 
>   Ralf
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>