linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bigsur?

To: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Bigsur?
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:16:18 +0100
Cc: Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net>, Jon Fraser <jfraser@broadcom.com>, Andrew Wiley <debio264@gmail.com>, "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <20090520110105.6fb81573@ripper.onstor.net>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <ecbbfeda0905152014t62281c79k2001e428da65a442@mail.gmail.com> <1242663215.18301.26.camel@chaos.ne.broadcom.com> <20090518222334.GD16847@linux-mips.org> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0905182335510.20791@ftp.linux-mips.org> <1242735440.6098.101.camel@localhost> <20090519125310.GA17733@linux-mips.org> <20090520110105.6fb81573@ripper.onstor.net>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:01:05AM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:

> Question: are machines that must be NFS-root and tftp booted acceptable
> or not acceptable for such work?  The machines in question would 750MHz
> Sibyte 1250s, so 3 Gigabit ports natively, and 2 serial consoles.

For many uses that will be decent but there are still a few things out
there that don't quite work the same way on NFS that they do on other
filesystems and that tends to break some software and autoconf-like
things.  I'd probably give such a config a 90% score - good for most stuff.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>