On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:33:18 +0100, Mark Brown
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:25:42AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> > Thank you for elaboration. Then, this untested patch (on top of the
> > last patch) is what you mean? If yes, I will split this into arch
> > part and driver part, and then update both patches.
> Partly - I'd also expect to see the resources moved around in the
> architecture code so that they are on the platform devices that are
> being used to probe the DAIs (unless that's what the architecture side
> of your patch was doing, patch wasn't quite giving me enough context to
> be 100% clear).
Now the resources are provided with "txx9aclc-ac97" platform device
which used to probe DAIs. I will send whole patchset again after some
> You could also roll the resource requesting and unrequesting into the
> probe functions for the DAI & DMA platform devices, though that is not
OK, I will move them into txx9aclc_ac97_dev_probe(). Then I can use
devres functions to make the resource management much simpler.