[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole

To: Linus Torvalds <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole
From: Markus Gutschke (顧孟勤) <>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 11:46:24 -0700
Cc: Roland McGrath <>, Andrew Morton <>,,,,,,
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=beta; t=1241635588; bh=Q+b/Cs+fXaDVVEvdP3PKlSD0wvU=; h=DomainKey-Signature:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date: Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-System-Of-Record; b=LLWlJgYDqD/+O6t64S 94iXOMvBke4XwAHkI+kNyPCVIJXlKsJV/24plAr3cRz2QRuLD4KsI7uZQtkagFvncoe A==
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta;; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; b=q8oC4wIOhKToS6RK0kv7SFiCUWBJ/mj+/cHDBwGiQEto6ZvkY/1yVDbZQpioTAg2f pN1fZvu/fvUXnDGKYwkvA==
In-reply-to: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902280916470.3111@localhost.localdomain>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902271932520.3111@localhost.localdomain> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902271948570.3111@localhost.localdomain> <> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902280916470.3111@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:23, Linus Torvalds
<> wrote:
> And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially a
> 2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody actually _uses_ seccomp. It
> does seem to be enabled in at least Fedora kernels, but it might not be
> used anywhere.

In the Linux version of Google Chrome, we are currently working on
code that will use seccomp for parts of our sandboxing solution.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>