linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: initramfs breakage with 64-bits kernels?

To: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
Subject: Re: initramfs breakage with 64-bits kernels?
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 10:19:56 +0200
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VEHYLE1/JNSkUoibEt/tDpFHXIP1sBdkJ6L/OYF1g4g=; b=rBLtnxJvev6MuUuBM8VV8/2DLozlhruxPQWZ7c1qYYif+pnj9paIEUPlx3ElhDFDE9 6w2nK9qka4WzGAUAvOwBCI0I/yiQlNJjRIMkFJg+c8jxia759loH3uCpbt98olSwn6TX +KBeVueXzk3/oy2G6C7Bm3aDou0fOhBd2UsG0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=IU79kxy8AuXZpNbiCn15k5V3NtC+pgUcjkClaPGl6dXhg9A/2N6LJk9KGzA9wq6l0k w/97Ba/zxjZsQmKdg+l9ezdMab6r3fnIrHAk9qBrqwRF24k1AnnQdrzss7/G9cHmaPLi gQpciHBCriqJYOhv+fhKH6TynGUKJ+cv9VvhM=
In-reply-to: <200904302141.53025.florian@openwrt.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <200904302141.53025.florian@openwrt.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 21:41, Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org> wrote:
> I have been trying to get a 2.6.29 64-bits kernel for Cavium Octeon to work
> with a 32-bits userland in an initramfs. While booting, the kernel does not
> find the initramfs due to the check against initrd_start in populate_rootfs
> (init/initramfs.c) failing.

You mean the test for initrd_start being non-zero? Is your initramfs really at
address zero?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                                                Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                                            -- Linus Torvalds

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>