linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] 0002-sgi-o2-gbe-mte-init.diff

To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 0002-sgi-o2-gbe-mte-init.diff
From: Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik_a@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1241124217; bh=lkOW0LWhHP+63+DOvDWs4m07ks5p2K5RuOtHwmmc/jA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QHlObrBxoqem8IMy27+mUo4Xd67S1NtohIyIHROEoDPC08Fbj9M0L75CD6d59bIeJ6aCavu49kgilSm3asHa+Qra1Gf+PjTRojLXhARXyXyPfEbcP7jzAxXa/eHi1iXMonpTqNpeH/FUvJUL9fgp3MtxaYUztgtIL96i62kErbs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=06G6qtH3z4UOXCQmGiRusltSogLHAU9w1ZzaP3e007a711t0DoxNrADnAG7CWpdTRDXmWdDpY7NByaN/jhx5f0rwPBnxiOY5W47Y17mgxyUUvvEta0HO1IN5EQc+DP48SLI6quOPNpIZl6VYHQqpnzJq3M4HVgphr8qMwqHbfyM=;
In-reply-to: <49FA0831.8060406@caviumnetworks.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Reply-to: randrik_a@yahoo.com
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org



--- On Thu, 4/30/09, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:

> From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] 0002-sgi-o2-gbe-mte-init.diff
> To: randrik_a@yahoo.com
> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
> Date: Thursday, April 30, 2009, 8:21 PM
> Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
> > Very simple test patch, broke nothing for me.
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/gbefb.c
> b/drivers/video/gbefb.c
> > index ed732a8..1d3b599 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/gbefb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/gbefb.c
> 
> Are all these patch passing checkpatch.pl?  I see no
> Signed-off-by: headers.

No :( I mean i not even run checkpatch.pl on them .... sorry.
If my 'work' too premature here - i can move to another mail-list. Thanks 
anyway.

> 
> David Daney


      


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>