| To: | Markus Gothe <nietzsche@lysator.liu.se> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] MIPS: Implement the getcontext API |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:53:17 +0200 |
| Cc: | "David VomLehn (dvomlehn)" <dvomlehn@cisco.com>, Brian Foster <brian.foster@innova-card.com>, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, libc-ports@sourceware.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <5A24253D-8F6F-46CE-A121-AD5CADC6D7C8@lysator.liu.se> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902282326580.4064@tp.orcam.me.uk> <49AD6139.60209@caviumnetworks.com> <200903040919.29294.brian.foster@innova-card.com> <20090304154418.GA13464@linux-mips.org> <FF038EB85946AA46B18DFEE6E6F8A289BE0B68@xmb-rtp-218.amer.cisco.com> <20090402133855.GC15021@linux-mips.org> <5A24253D-8F6F-46CE-A121-AD5CADC6D7C8@lysator.liu.se> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 05:46:56AM +0200, Markus Gothe wrote: > That article is a classic one, just the name itself... > > However the article itself is based on M68K and Intel x86 IIRC. There is a variant or extension of it which specifically looks at MIPS o32 issues. > Indeed, IRIX < 6.2 was all o32, correct me if I'm wrong. > > To get back on track, what about a kernel that can be compiled by > MIPSPro C and not relaying on glibc and GNUisms (al right, 'asmlinkage' > cracked that idea once and for all a few years ago), but my point is to > change the libc as little as possible. Do you have a MIPSpro compiler that is hosted on a non-IRIX? Asmlinkage is just an empty define. > I hope I brought a grasp of light on the issue (and yes $ra is fun to > play with), and as Ralph pointed out: the special stack frame makes the > return address traceability disappear after one step as __GNUC__ knows > it. The first problem with the usual stack smashing techniques is that the return address of a leaf function is not getting stored on the stack at all, so can't be smashed by a stack overflow. So the caller's return address is becoming the new attack target. Ralf PS: Who's that Ralph? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] DMA: TXx9 Soc DMA Controller driver (v2), Dan Williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] DMA: TXx9 Soc DMA Controller driver (v2), Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] MIPS: Implement the getcontext API, Markus Gothe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] MIPS: Implement the getcontext API, Graziano Sorbaioli |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |