| To: | yanhua <yanh@lemote.com>, Arnaud Patard <apatard@mandriva.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, 彭亮锦 <penglj@lemote.com>, "zhangfx@lemote.com" <zhangfx@lemote.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/14] lemote: Loongson2F based machines support |
| From: | yanhua <yanh@lemote.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:25:54 +0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <20090413113640.GB6137@adriano.hkcable.com.hk> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <49DD7E88.7040305@lemote.com> <m3prfm6x1d.fsf@anduin.mandriva.com> <49DDB965.3060200@lemote.com> <20090413113640.GB6137@adriano.hkcable.com.hk> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
Zhang Le 写道: Yes, We will rearrange the directory structure and make they share the common code.On 17:01 Thu 09 Apr , yanhua wrote: [snip]This is just for historical reasons. Before, we have loongson2e machines named as fulong(from loogson2f, changeed to fuloong) merged into main kernel.I suggest we might as well change fulong to fuloong2e, while call 2f based fuloong fuloong2f (or something similar, you get the idea). Because, fulong and fuloong are almost indistinguishable, neither on spelling nor on pronunciation. Of course, we can deal with fulong(2e) later. However, I strongly suggest we get fuloong2f right in the first place. Zhang, Le -- 晏华 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/14] lemote: Loongson2F based machines support, Zhang Le |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/14] lemote: Loongson2F based machines support, Zhang Le |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/14] lemote: Loongson2F based machines support, Zhang Le |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/14] lemote: Loongson2F based machines support, Philippe Vachon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |