linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] tx4939ide: remove wmb()

To: Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tx4939ide: remove wmb()
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:18:52 +0200
Cc: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=ZQfV31w9zuzkLmzA7XUgQERtFJttqpSdHX7v8wY990U=; b=JI6W0YWIbSPwNaZWA7uBSRy/SjuY6boxmv++eQMT6Z3tNiVXpn45LJHXZgCIsJ+tQa IeDJNGbbWPcGe3upWNYNjqdqlZfym4jC0+DRL7tYrGIHRZZ6qNB/rf3m0nXKaJ7qRvhP KiVOePfojQl0Jdh3YQgX2wUBJP5s73nhUAu2Q=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=kp2HqGfvk/OgoZ9tZHfE01ANGLjerVskrYfZMU30Fm2QeFXppEeCUbIJi2+G1slbEg iL4iaMBtJUmssggDSnt4h9SNTVl0686GiA4/WlHEnyY80le3TMxbklnqBlBRLJ6UxcDm G1Cq0CbqvCsbPnsR9vgoua+0JuJFWIZJhPFs8=
In-reply-to: <da824cf30903310936p75469518j9bb28421b1ee81b8@mail.gmail.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1238516136-15852-1-git-send-email-anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <da824cf30903310936p75469518j9bb28421b1ee81b8@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.29-next-20090401; KDE/4.2.1; i686; ; )
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> > * define CHECK_DMA_MASK
> > * remove use of wmb()
> >
> > Suggested-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com>
> 
> Thank you for the attribution!
> 
> But I think proper header would be:
>     Reported-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com>
> 
> But in this case, since i've looked at the code and am under the
> illusion I understand it, I'm comfortable with:
>     Reviewed-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com>

Well, you can have both! ;)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>