| To: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: TXx9 Soc DMA Controller driver |
| From: | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:34:59 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cL9WIvUvZQA+dBNMltyy+yY7mfo7xk8stSTL+Hwr2dQ=; b=DFnHVrOI8mBbrBA4b488ZZrR2A8scyhegqPi//YZkReN89VzvN6ipbT8vvYtsFbQXr yqf+RKlnpTrwmGkJaHf28GwKWGBVo9FlgXvDlud5jg4zBxwJoI+UnLGAaoEFCXVC6AQF CYUH1FhXrM6KcicrHL1NGOQcs3TRlB8YmnmtQ= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=xrqXYMiJmYBSIWl9LpgRjfkETTa/WdGPoxCHLvLBW5wIf87hJmwQ/JmRYZVIh6EARe PO00K9dTJbxU7TADxtI3Y23HTcVkZBTxjtOr70PT5LI8qJsesaC8fPYVkxw7IEFgxeSH 73Vp3jmVxFaoyg4jWjYZ2nX2rfR8U2yjMPXuk= |
| In-reply-to: | <20090326.231243.112855442.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20090318.110154.76582864.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <e9c3a7c20903181026h1801ef6i945e6ce9ccb36b8a@mail.gmail.com> <20090321.212920.25912728.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20090326.231243.112855442.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> wrote: > On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:29:20 +0900 (JST), Atsushi Nemoto > <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> wrote: > Unfortunately, not so simple. If I created a dma_device for each > channel, all chan->chan_id will be 0 and all chan->device->dev points > same platform device. This makes client driver hard to select the > particular channel. Making a platform device for each channel will > solve this, but it looks wrong way to go for me. Why? mv_xor, iop-adma, and ioat each have a platform or pci device per channel so you would be in good company. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: The impact to change page size to 16k for cache alias, Zhang Le |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: The impact to change page size to 16k for cache alias, Peter Watkins |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: TXx9 Soc DMA Controller driver, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: TXx9 Soc DMA Controller driver, Dan Williams |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |