| To: | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole |
| From: | Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:36:04 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org |
| Emacs: | the prosecution rests its case. |
| In-reply-to: | Ingo Molnar's message of Saturday, 28 February 2009 08:31:54 +0100 <20090228073154.GG9351@elte.hu> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20090228030226.C0D34FC3DA@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20090228030413.5B915FC3DA@magilla.sf.frob.com> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902271932520.3111@localhost.localdomain> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902271948570.3111@localhost.localdomain> <20090228072554.CFEA6FC3DA@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20090228073154.GG9351@elte.hu> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
> btw., shouldnt is_compat_task() expand to 0 in the > !CONFIG_COMPAT case? That way we could remove this #ifdef too. > (and move the first #ifdef inside the array initialization so > that we always have a mode1_syscalls_32[] array.) I guess you mean define it in linux/compat.h then? Go right ahead. Whatever you want is fine by me. Thanks, Roland |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole, Ingo Molnar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole, Linus Torvalds |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole, Ingo Molnar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole, Linus Torvalds |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |