| To: | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier. |
| From: | Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:41:13 +1030 |
| Cc: | David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901081256170.3283@localhost.localdomain> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1231446081-8448-1-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <496666CE.3050205@caviumnetworks.com> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901081256170.3283@localhost.localdomain> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27-9-generic; KDE/4.1.3; i686; ; ) |
On Friday 09 January 2009 07:26:59 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, David Daney wrote: > > > > The 'inline' seems gratuitous to me. Since it is static GCC should do > > the Right Thing. However since you suggested it, I am testing it that > > way. > > Trust me, gcc very seldom does the Right Thing(tm) when it comes to > inlining. > > Linus Note that there's a downside: with inline funcs in .c files you don't get a warning should they become unused in future cleanups. Cheers, Rusty. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problem compiling glibc, Atsushi Nemoto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] define io_map_base for rc32434's PCI controller, Florian Fainelli |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier., Linus Torvalds |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier., Mike Travis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |