linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH resend] Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c

To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Kevin D. Kissell <kevink@mips.com>, Lucas Woods <woodzy@gmail.com>, Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: [PATCH resend] Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c
From: Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:07:57 +1100
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>
Mail-from: nobody Fri Dec 5 14:07:57 2008
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: StGIT/0.14.2
Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c

It should be 'lose', not 'loose'.

Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>
---

 arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
index 972b2d2..a1b3da6 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
@@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ static int vpe_release(struct inode *inode, struct file 
*filp)
 
        /* It's good to be able to run the SP and if it chokes have a look at
           the /dev/rt?. But if we reset the pointer to the shared struct we
-          loose what has happened. So perhaps if garbage is sent to the vpe
+          lose what has happened. So perhaps if garbage is sent to the vpe
           device, use it as a trigger for the reset. Hopefully a nice
           executable will be along shortly. */
        if (ret < 0)



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [PATCH resend] Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c, Nick Andrew <=